The recent port deal between Ethiopia and the self-declared Republic of Somaliland has sparked significant controversy, especially with Somalia, leading to a diplomatic standoff that has drawn Türkiye into the fray as a mediator. The Somalia government’s reaction to the deal, which it deemed illegal, and its subsequent actions raise critical questions about its approach to diplomacy, regional stability, and internal governance.
Background of the Dispute
Earlier this year, Ethiopia signed a deal with Somaliland to lease 20 kilometers (12 miles) of coastline. This agreement was seen as a significant step towards recognizing Somaliland’s independence, a status it has sought since declaring itself a republic in 1991. However, Somalia, which claims sovereignty over Somaliland, vehemently opposed the deal. The Somali government’s response was swift and severe: it expelled the Ethiopian ambassador and threatened to expel thousands of Ethiopian troops who are crucial in the fight against Islamist insurgents within Somalia.
Diplomatic Fallout
Somalia’s retaliatory actions have further strained relations with Ethiopia, an essential ally in the region. The decision to expel the Ethiopian ambassador is particularly short-sighted, given the geopolitical complexities and the ongoing security threats from groups like Al-Shabaab. By undermining its relationship with Ethiopia, Somalia risks destabilizing the fragile regional balance and weakening its own security infrastructure.
Moreover, the Somali government’s hardline stance appears counterproductive. Diplomacy often requires flexibility and negotiation, especially when national and regional interests are at stake. The refusal to engage in dialogue unless Ethiopia withdraws the agreement with Somaliland displays a rigidity that hinders constructive resolution. Such an approach may isolate Somalia diplomatically, as it shows an unwillingness to work towards pragmatic solutions.
Türkiye’s Mediation Efforts
Türkiye’s involvement as a mediator underscores its significant influence and investment in both Somalia and Ethiopia. Since President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s visit to Mogadishu in 2011, Türkiye has been a critical ally, providing extensive development assistance, military training, and support in various sectors. Türkiye’s commitment to Somalia’s maritime security and territorial integrity illustrates its strategic interests in the region.
However, the effectiveness of Türkiye’s mediation is uncertain. According to officials familiar with the talks, the goal of the negotiation remains unclear, and expectations for a resolution are low. Despite Türkiye’s efforts, the entrenched positions of Somalia and Ethiopia make a breakthrough unlikely.
Somaliland’s Perspective
Somaliland, which has enjoyed relative peace and stability compared to the rest of Somalia, was not involved in the mediation talks. This exclusion highlights a significant flaw in the negotiation process. For any meaningful resolution, all relevant parties must be included. Ignoring Somaliland’s role and interests perpetuates the very issue at the heart of the dispute: the lack of recognition and respect for its self-governance and aspirations for independence.
Critique of Somalia’s Approach
The Somali government’s handling of the port deal crisis reflects broader issues within its political and diplomatic strategies. The aggressive stance against Ethiopia may rally nationalist sentiments internally but fails to address the underlying challenges facing Somalia. The expulsion of diplomats and threats against allied troops reveal a reactive rather than proactive approach to foreign policy.
Furthermore, Somalia’s insistence on Somaliland’s subjugation rather than seeking a constructive dialogue to address mutual interests and regional stability is shortsighted. This approach neglects the potential benefits of cooperating with Somaliland and Ethiopia for economic development and regional security.
